This morning on Saturday Nation with Wade McAllister
Cignetti Fires Back After 8-1 Indiana Slides From No. 4 to No. 9 in the Playoff Rankings During a Bye Week
The Hoosiers' coach went to X with two pointed questions and a string of emojis. The committee chair blamed bad timing and a rough week for Indiana's opponents. Now No. 18 USC comes to Bloomington.
Filed November 13, 2026 · 📍 Miami, FL 33130
Were you there? Share your story
Key points
- Indiana fell from No. 4 to No. 9 in Tuesday's College Football Playoff rankings without playing, after a bye week.
- Curt Cignetti responded on X, asking whether bad losses still count, alongside laughing and clown emojis.
- Committee chair Hunter Yurachek blamed the bye's timing and Week 10 losses by Indiana's past opponents.
- The 8-1 Hoosiers, still without a ranked win, host No. 18 USC on Saturday.
Indiana did not play a down last weekend, and it still fell five spots. When the College Football Playoff committee released its new rankings Tuesday night, the 8-1 Hoosiers had slid from No. 4 to No. 9, and by Thursday afternoon coach Curt Cignetti had posted his answer on X [1][2].
"Bad losses don't count anymore?" Cignetti wrote, followed by a string of crying-laughing emojis, The Comeback reported [1]. He followed with a second jab, "Are first downs still 10 yards?" punctuated with clown emojis, according to WDRB [2]. FOX Sports also described the post as heavy on laughing and clown emojis [4].
It is not the first time the Indiana coach has gone after the rankings. The Comeback noted that Cignetti has previously criticized the committee and ESPN over what he sees as a tilt toward the SEC [1], and WDRB columnist Eric Crawford wrote that Cignetti and several Big Ten colleagues have made that same accusation [2].
What the Committee Said
Committee chairman Hunter Yurachek explained the drop Tuesday night. "Indiana was probably the victim of having a bye week at the wrong time," he said, as quoted by Breitbart [3]. He added that every Big Ten team Indiana had already played lost in Week 10, which dragged down the Hoosiers' strength of record and strength of schedule, according to The Comeback and Breitbart [1][3].
Yurachek also pointed to what the teams around Indiana did on the field. He cited Notre Dame's win over Miami, Texas' win over Missouri and UCLA's victory on the road [1], and he praised Alabama for its big win at LSU, FOX Sports reported [4].
The teams now ahead of Indiana carry real blemishes, which is the heart of Cignetti's complaint. Top-ranked Georgia lost at home to unranked Auburn, and No. 3 Alabama has two losses, including a 16-point defeat against Tennessee, WDRB noted [2]. No. 6 Texas is 7-2 with losses to Oklahoma and Florida, two teams that are 5-4 [1][4]. Tennessee, another two-loss SEC team, sits at No. 8, one spot ahead of the Hoosiers [1].
Indiana's lone loss came against Ohio State, by four points, when the Buckeyes were ranked fourth [2].
The Case Against Indiana
Not everyone is buying the coach's argument. The Hoosiers' wins have come against North Texas, Howard, Western Kentucky, Northwestern, Rutgers, Nebraska, Michigan and Minnesota, and they have yet to beat a ranked opponent, WDRB noted [2]. Both the Michigan and Minnesota wins needed overtime [2][4], and The Comeback reported that Indiana needed a 60-yard field goal at the horn just to force the extra period against Minnesota [1].
The offense has also cooled. With its quarterback hurt, Indiana has averaged 17.8 points over its last four games, according to WDRB [2], and FOX Sports reported the Hoosiers could start their backup against USC [4]. The computer rankings are mixed: WDRB listed Indiana 10th in Sagarin, eighth in ESPN's FPI and fifth in Massey, with Sagarin rating its schedule only 54th in the country [2].
FOX Sports' RJ Young argued that bad losses matter only when two teams' good wins are roughly equal, and Indiana has none to match the ranked wins Texas has piled up. He called the committee's bye-week explanation flawed but said its conclusion was right, and he warned that coaches who complain with three regular-season games left "become the very thing they claim to be above: fans" [4].
Crawford landed in the middle. He agreed Cignetti has a point about bad losses but argued that good wins have to count too, noting that Georgia beat Alabama. In his view the committee's bigger mistake was ranking Indiana fourth the week before, and No. 9 may be a fair spot [2]. Breitbart said it was unclear exactly what the coach was driving at, since the teams ahead of Indiana with bad losses also own far better wins [3].
Why It Matters in December
This is not just a fight over pride. A No. 4 ranking would have meant a first-round bye and a trip to the Cotton Bowl quarterfinal; No. 9 means a first-round road game in December, WDRB explained [2]. The committee unveils its final rankings on Sunday, Dec. 6 [1].
Wade's Take
I have a lot of respect for what Curt Cignetti has built. WDRB noted that the 65-year-old, who coached under Nick Saban at Alabama, has taken a program that was long a Big Ten afterthought to two straight playoff appearances and a national title [2]. He did it the old-fashioned way: recruit tough kids, coach them hard and expect them to win.
But the old-fashioned way cuts both ways. Respect in college football is earned on Saturdays, not on social media, and the committee is right that Indiana's resume is thin on signature wins. The good news for Hoosier fans is that the remedy sits right in front of them.
No. 18 USC, at 7-2, comes to Bloomington on Saturday [1][2]. Beat a ranked Trojans team, with or without the starting quarterback, and Indiana will have the one thing its resume is missing. Lose, and the conversation about emojis and first downs will not matter much. That is the beauty of this sport: the scoreboard settles what the arguments cannot.
Sources
Should athletes keep politics out of the game?
- Yes, just play
- They can speak off the field
- They have every right to speak out
Were you there?
If you were at the scene, or this story touched your life, tell us what you saw and what it was like.



Discussion 0
Sign in or create a free account to join the discussion.
No comments yet. Start the discussion.